Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 01:02
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
The #1 Snack for Better Gut Health, Recommended by a Gastroenterologist - AOL.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Do happily married husbands cheat?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What's the gayest thing you have experienced on an only boys sleepover?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Why does the God of the Bible condemn homosexual acts?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Harvard doctor lists 6 cancer causing foods: What are their alternatives - Times of India
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
European leaders worry they’re too reliant on U.S. tech - TechCrunch
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The Largest Black Hole Jet Ever Found Is 3 Times the Size of the Milky Way - The Daily Galaxy
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear: